Small shops and the real cost of a first robot

Smaller manufacturers are often described as the next big market for industrial robots. A recent Industry Insights piece from the Association for Advancing Automation (A3) looks at why many of them still hesitate, and what tends to work when they do go ahead.

The robot is only part of the bill

A3's central point is that buying a robot and deploying a working cell are different purchases. A machine-tending cell can also need a gripper, fixtures, machine interfaces, safety equipment, programming and training. A large plant can spread those costs across many lines and an engineering team; a small shop usually cannot.

The article adds two risks that hit small companies harder: downtime, because there is often no second line to absorb the work, and skills, because the people who will run and restart the cell usually already wear several hats.

What the successful examples share

The piece walks through several small manufacturers in Michigan and Ohio that added collaborative robots with help from their regional Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) centers. A3 is careful to call these individual stories rather than typical results. What they had in common was a specific production problem, outside technical help, and results the company could measure. One shop tried a loaner robot on a real task before committing.

Takeaways for a first project

• Start from one well-defined task, not a general wish to automate.
• Cost out the whole cell, including tooling, guarding, integration and training.
• Plan who will troubleshoot and restart it on a normal shift.
• Ask your state's MEP center about assessments, training or a trial before you buy.

← Back to Robot USA